Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nick Gold's avatar

How much do these members of Congress really care about transparency, when they won’t even bring sitting officials in under oath and ask them very blunt questions about the situation.

“Dr. Kosloski, surely after 80 years of secret government programs relating to UFOs/UAP, some intelligence assessments must have been generated regarding the possibilities for what these things might be, their potential nature and origin. Don’t the American People deserve to know what their government thinks these objects might represent? What is the President told, when he asks that question of our intelligence community? Surely there must have been some estimates produced at some point.”

It’s really not so hard, but none of them will do it. The closest we got was Rep Rick Crawford’s question of Scott Bray, then head of Naval Intelligence, about cases that might indicate some non-human/unnatural origin. We got one of the frankest statements yet, when Bray instantly went to the 2004 Nimitz incident, said people have an understanding of what happened, “we have data on it,” and it “remains unresolved.” It was “very hard to explain.” But then he went back to “unresolved,” with Moultrie giving him a very obvious stare-down. Surely “unresolved” has been more granularly considered, within some compartment(s).

We get so distracted by “Lockheed” and “the grays, the mantids, the reptoids, the nordics,” the learn to channel UFO beings online classes, all of it, nobody asks the basic flipping questions of relevant people.

“You say there’s no definitive evidence that these things are extraterrestrial, although DNI Haines has publicly said the IC is trying to figure out if they might be of extraterrestrial origin. Is that considered a possibility by the IC and DoD? What are the various possibilities that have been staked out, at various confidence levels? Don’t the American People deserve a report that levels with them about the thinking in the IC and DoD, and even civilian agencies, similar to the COVID origins report that was issued by ODNI?”

UFO Intel's avatar

I agree with Rep. Anna Paulina Luna. Pull the plug on the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office.

I have researched the Aguadilla UFO case.

SCU’s research into this case has exposed AARO. AARO is nothing more than a disinformation operation.

My Grok conversation about the Aguadilla UFO case:

Present an overview of the following case (point-by-point):

The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office has published two different explanations for the 26 April 2013 Aguadilla, Puerto Rico, UFO incident ("Case: 'The Puerto Rico Object") (aaro.mil).

First it was two balloons. The last report says it was two sky lanterns. But none of the AARO reports report on the wind direction.

According to the SCU: The wind direction was ENE. The object flew due south.

https://x.com/i/grok/share/TB0Ti221bDemHCjvZp1bNsQQX

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?