23 Comments

Follow the trail of purposefully discombobulated BS that has occurred after the 12-17-17 NYTimes article, and you see a perfect example of how a psychological operation works.

Expand full comment

Thanks Billy and wonderful you refd. Jan Aldrich and Prof. Wendt too.

If hitchhiker type effects were known of very early (from Skinwalkers at the Pentagon this seems to have happened to Kenneth Arnold and the Tic-Tac witness pilots, the book doesn't say who, have had them) then isn't it not surprising there's been a cover-up and secret studies (e.g. the big one at the Battelle Memorial Institute at least in the 1950's)? How was it dealt with in these studies? Were pilots/witnesses back then having HH's? Physical effects? Surely. Maybe SP has been required reading to those forming these new UAP offices at the Pentagon but it's totally mindblowing, so much that no news orgs. have touched it. Did a quick search. Can this crazy data be released officially? - like "My fellow Americans, we have been aware of for decades a phenomenon that sends shadow beings, intelligent lights and fantastic creatures into your homes and neighbourhoods? These are real, dear people, and we cannot stop these occurrences. But we are working on it."

I don't know, maybe some things shouldn't be that well known. It's not that those who must surely know after all this time what's going on are being nasty by hiding stuff, maybe people should be protected just like we all may be kind of "owned" by these others. Maybe new crazy contact cults could arise. Has Alexander Wendt written recently on his fears, wow, I remember his 2008 paper too? Oh, BTW, it was nice the aliens let the James Webb pass by them – they must approve, ha, ha.

Expand full comment

A terrific piece, Billy. Thanks for all your digging and diligence.

Good grief, must we fight the UFO Agincourt battle repeatedly? "Once more unto the breach..."

I do not share Prof. Wendt's concern about civilizational collapse, as if some type of mass panic or hysteria would compel populations to stop participating in their life's duties.

No, the collapse I expect would be of the status quo - the institutional political, financial, social and religious power structures that have kept humanity oppressed and in thrall for generations.

THAT is the fear of the planetary elites. And THAT, I submit, is the deep, nefarious secret behind the international coverup. Power and control must be preserved.

Mister Myxlplyx? Ha! How about that. Cross my heart I had virtually the same thought after reading the Deputy SecDef memo.

The "Mind Belt" is real.

Expand full comment
Jan 8, 2022Liked by Billy Cox

I learned something new about Jan Aldrich. Great article as always Billy. Thanks.

Expand full comment

Luis or someone needs to blow the lid on the cover up and probably violate their NDA. Their cover could be illegalities which may out way the NDA part. The problem maybe that Luis does not know enough to seal the deal. That has always been how these secret programs work.

Expand full comment
Jan 8, 2022·edited Jan 9, 2022

Sorry that I'm off topic here...Chris Mellon posted a new blog.. Comments were turned off , probably due to interlopers like Michael Horn, who will sabotage discussions very easily..

https://www.christophermellon.net/post/why-hasn-t-lue-elizondo-been-offered-his-dod-job-back?postId=3e6d7bf6-a75d-4d83-af16-835831723803

The DOD will never consider this recommendation...Elizondo previously publicly stated the obvious regarding the DOD "backing themselves into the corner"before the release of 6-25-21 report... In addition, it's my understanding that Elizondo filed his intention to sue the DOD and is represented by attorney, advocate Danniel Sheehan..

1.Why would the DOD, as a previous employer, and an intelligence agency that requires strict security clearances including N/D/A's, invite back a former employee who is a plaintiff in a lawsuit against the very agency that he resigned from??... and IMO very valid and grounded reasons to leave of his own volition?

2.From the POV of a previous employer, would you welcome back a former employee who resigned and then goes on the lecture circuit, pointing out the obvious about the cover-ups that have been strongly entrenched for over the past 75 years???

3.Would an intelligence agency welcome back someone who would be positioned to learn more about data that he no longer needs to be privy to, w/o violating his prior N/D/A's ?...

4.You don't point out the obvious to an established military agency who doesn't welcome input with information that they don't desire to read or hear..IOW..The ballgame isn't on the level and a large % of the American public fully recognize and understand this

5. This blog by Mellon had to be written to get the attention of congressional members who for the most part are simply self-serving noise makers and vote panderers whose agenda is the enrich themselves while remaining in office.. and its clear that only one rep from CT politely replied back to consider reviewing the contents of the thumb drive

Pretty effin pathetic!!

Am I missing something??

Expand full comment