Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Freeman69's avatar

While it would be nice to have at least one complete report on a UAP incident; one report isn't going to cut it and there's always the more-than-likely possibility that it could turn out to be something mundane.

Everyone has their favoured cases, depending on how any individual weighs the evidence using the skills and knowledge at their disposal, and that's how everyone (who is pro-UAP-study) comes to the conclusion that there's a signal within the noise; which clearly shows that the public needs to see ALL of the BEST cases for there to be any long term benefit.

This is the issue that's remained unanswered since the mission of Mellon and friends became clearer: Is the official study of UAP meant to benefit the general public or provide a benefit to the U.S. military? Although that sounds like a conspiracy theory, it's simply the manner in which the machinery of government works.

While we're all hoping that witnesses (protected from possible prosecution) step forward to tell Congress their experiences, the public still needs whistle-blowers to reveal what's been discussed in those secret meetings.

A government of the people, by the people and for the people doesn't necessarily inform the people, when it appears to serve the greater good for them not to know.

Expand full comment
Don James's avatar

Nice to see that Powell totally gets the financial aspect of this. But, I don’t see how the AARO thinks it can penetrate topics “above top secret”. Where would the balance be between disclosure and security?

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts