It is somewhat disheartening viewing the last congressional hearing as there were no direct sources willing to speak about what they know. Lou Elizondo is the closest but also carries a little baggage around with him on his associations with TTS (Tom Delonge). As others have said the current crop of so called witnesses get there info primarily from sources who they cannot reveal to the public (but maybe in a SCIF?). In any case, IMO these types of hearings are dead in the water now and offer really nothing new to advance the narrative. I have said this in the past, until you can get a witness who has been directly involved with the cover up (programs etc.) you basically have nothing more to offer. Tim Burchett is now saying the same thing and one who has in the past been helpful in promoting these hearings. The words 'I can tell you in SCIF" or "I cannot disclose that info to you based on the NDA I signed" is not going to work anymore. Lou Elizondo is the worst offender of this type of dialogue, when responding to specific questions an such. Yet they keep pulling him in as a key witness hoping he will go further on what he actually knows. In essence unless they can pull in some first hand witnesses similar to David Fravor the hearings will become useless and could actually be a detriment to 'disclosure'.
You can get a different perspective on some of the newer YouTube bloggers such as " Vetted " and one hosted by Kristen Harloff
Their hosts stay out of political discussions.
They are hopeful for transparency but will point out that LE. may have lost some credibility in his presentation to a private audience in PA a few weeks ago.The " mothership" photo taken in Romania in 2022 turned about to a reflection of a chandelier.Sorta begs the question what other tales has he fabricated?? As far as the trailer in the new Netflix UAP series video ..most viewers see a doctored film
Kristan Harloff is correct that the congressional hearing is a repeat of the 2023 hearing.There will be no whistle blowers coming forward.Simply testimony from seasoned ex- military and civilians who know more than they can reveal except in a SCIF.Since there have already been more than a few closed hearings then why hasn't Congress pursued this on the QT with the eyewitness testimony provided in the classified setting.None of this adds up
Billy's blog is exceptional. 'Vetted' may be different, but it's not concise and not delivered with color or as much depth and intellect.
As far as Elizondo goes, he's lost a little credibility among those who haven't read up on counter intelligence games and disinfo. For people who know nothing about the subject he's doing remarkably well. The podcaster, 'Diary of a CEO,' interviewed Lue recently. 1.2 million views, in 12 days. The comments are overwhelmingly positive. Nearly all over 6000 of them.
Kristan Harloff is wrong. The testimony coming from tomorrow's witnesses won't be a repeat. The info may not be new to you, but it will be for the general public and likely to some in Congress.
Retired rear admiral, Tim Gallaudet, will be providing some amazing testimony. It could be the bomb we've all been waiting for. And we may find out more about Immaculate Constellation too.
Sadly I do not believe that the general public has considerable interest in the subject, but I hope to be incorrect in my opinion, no matter what the outcome of today's hearing.
The general public doesn't have interest in significant numbers yet, but the numbers are increasing. Of more significance is the fact that carefully crafted propaganda, using the ego sensitivities of the academic class, have been breached. Those walls haven't completely crumbled yet, but the process has begun, due to the efforts of highly credible witnesses being questioned in Congress.
Here is the new National Security Advisor, Michael Waltz, being interviewed by Ernie Sampera, of Florida's Voice News, a year ago. I mistakenly thought the interview was very recent.
I remember the contrail conspiracy. The idea that the government(?) was flying jets over certain areas of the US and spewing out some chemical to make people below cognitively stupid. Looks to me like they did not need to.
Excellent Billy. Very alarming, at the same time. A plus on the side of rapid disclosure is the fact that MAGA is not as ideologically (or neurologically perhaps?) opposed to Disclosure and may be casting about for their next shot of adrenaline before Trump blows the Middle East to smithereens.
Two months is a long long time, in dog and social media years.
Right. And it's encouraging to see Republicans spearheading the push for disclosure. I'm not sure they appreciate the full range of destabilization it could wreak.
Michael Waltz, the new National Security Advisor, is also on board, in a big way. I will try to find and link to the video interview I watched yesterday where Waltz referred specifically to his concerns that the Pentagon was obstructing and threatening Grusch and others. Seems to be quite a significant leap frog over the current toads at the top.
Since we don't know *exactly* what they're sitting on, I'd start with some basic housekeeping that wouldn't necessarily get anyone in trouble (at first). For instance, the "Estimate of the Situation" that came out of Project Sign in 1948 -- which concluded "flying saucers" had ET origins -- was allegedly destroyed, but I'd pull that one out of the vault. I'd declassify John Burroughs' (Rendlesham Forest) medical records, release them to him, and let him take it from there. Records from the 1981 Cash-Landrum Incident, which may or may not have involved a legit UFO, need to be declassified as a show of good faith. The 23-minute long triangle video that Elizondo has seen -- as well as the numerous others he's alluded to -- should be released,. The footage can obviously be scrubbed of metadata, and I'd put them out there in steady but unremitting batches between now and Jan. 20 that would lead to more obvious leads, i.e., the analyses of these images. Since they tell conflicting stories about their knowledge of UFO data, I'd put former CIA directors John Brennan and Robert Gates under oath. Put "Chase Brandon" or whatever his name is on the stand, too. I'm leaving out tons of stuff but it's a target-rich environment. And this is just for starters. As for who should release it, I'm not for Julian Assange-type data dumps, but agency leaders will likely need prodding from insiders with access to this material. Everyone needs to recognize the urgency of the crisis we're in.
I would like to applaud and support this article, but my constant computer use has significantly lowered my IQ to the point that I've already forgotten what the article was about.
Larry, the people in the US that I'm in touch have an attendant concern, and that is Palestinian genocide.
They refused to reward Harris/Biden with a vote, preferring to vote Jill Stein, more as a pro-Palestinian protest vote. Now, those who stayed home, may have done so for purely economic reasons, but could have had strong moral reasons for doing so as well.
The university educated working class, those who haven't yet niched into the technocratic liberal sphere, (and likely never will) are solidly anti-establishment and anti-war.
This NYT guest essay by John Della Volpe does more to explain here:
Trying to delete my response, but was unable to, so am editing it out here.
'Disclosure' has a clear meaning. As in, force those who have been operating in the shadows to come clean about crash retrievals.
That could easily segue from the nuts and bolts to the ethereal; an unknowable mystery.
I suppose the question in the minds of many who are familiar with the topic is whether it has a core physicality with technology that appears to give it a magical quality--or the reverse--that it has a core of pure consciousness, with attendant magical dreamlike elements, plus an ability to manifest as physical, or in the physical.
We are in our infancy when it comes to this subject. And, though I've been studying it for over 50 years, that is still, relatively speaking, a very short time.
For those without a subscription. A few paragraphs, copy and pasted below:
"As a pollster who focuses on the hopes and worries of these Americans, losing to Donald Trump — not once but twice — represents a profound failure. Ms. Harris’s campaign needed to shift about one percentage point of voters across Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin to secure the presidency"
"While Ms. Harris fought valiantly for the 107 days of her campaign, the party’s systematic disconnection from its base’s most urgent moral and economic concerns cost them the election."
David Brooks, also NYT, pointed to the same thing. Our society has created a large group of citizens who feel unseen, unheard. Trump and his wealthy cohorts found ways to reach many of them. The central emotional value of feeling understood was far more powerful than the details of Trump's mendacity. Later, when they complain about the problems that will arise for many of them, Trump will turn on them.
Yes, their own 'elite' will support their base when their desires align, but abandon them, when they don't.
I'll have to read what Brooks had to say. I have a subscription as much to follow the comments as the actual articles, as they tell me more, through reaction to articles, than the articles themselves.
Joe Murgia exposes Dr. Kosloski and AARO.
Joe Murgia, great work!
Dismantle AARO, now!
https://x.com/theufojoe/status/1859253428452839931
"Rep. Tim Burchett says Trump will be the UFO Disclosure President
'I’ve talked to President Trump. I’m convinced that if he’s elected, there will be disclosure.'"
Rep. Tim Burchett—I wholeheartedly agree!
https://x.com/uapjames/status/1850964637526757799
It is somewhat disheartening viewing the last congressional hearing as there were no direct sources willing to speak about what they know. Lou Elizondo is the closest but also carries a little baggage around with him on his associations with TTS (Tom Delonge). As others have said the current crop of so called witnesses get there info primarily from sources who they cannot reveal to the public (but maybe in a SCIF?). In any case, IMO these types of hearings are dead in the water now and offer really nothing new to advance the narrative. I have said this in the past, until you can get a witness who has been directly involved with the cover up (programs etc.) you basically have nothing more to offer. Tim Burchett is now saying the same thing and one who has in the past been helpful in promoting these hearings. The words 'I can tell you in SCIF" or "I cannot disclose that info to you based on the NDA I signed" is not going to work anymore. Lou Elizondo is the worst offender of this type of dialogue, when responding to specific questions an such. Yet they keep pulling him in as a key witness hoping he will go further on what he actually knows. In essence unless they can pull in some first hand witnesses similar to David Fravor the hearings will become useless and could actually be a detriment to 'disclosure'.
You can get a different perspective on some of the newer YouTube bloggers such as " Vetted " and one hosted by Kristen Harloff
Their hosts stay out of political discussions.
They are hopeful for transparency but will point out that LE. may have lost some credibility in his presentation to a private audience in PA a few weeks ago.The " mothership" photo taken in Romania in 2022 turned about to a reflection of a chandelier.Sorta begs the question what other tales has he fabricated?? As far as the trailer in the new Netflix UAP series video ..most viewers see a doctored film
Kristan Harloff is correct that the congressional hearing is a repeat of the 2023 hearing.There will be no whistle blowers coming forward.Simply testimony from seasoned ex- military and civilians who know more than they can reveal except in a SCIF.Since there have already been more than a few closed hearings then why hasn't Congress pursued this on the QT with the eyewitness testimony provided in the classified setting.None of this adds up
Billy's blog is exceptional. 'Vetted' may be different, but it's not concise and not delivered with color or as much depth and intellect.
As far as Elizondo goes, he's lost a little credibility among those who haven't read up on counter intelligence games and disinfo. For people who know nothing about the subject he's doing remarkably well. The podcaster, 'Diary of a CEO,' interviewed Lue recently. 1.2 million views, in 12 days. The comments are overwhelmingly positive. Nearly all over 6000 of them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkNVSju99HY
Kristan Harloff is wrong. The testimony coming from tomorrow's witnesses won't be a repeat. The info may not be new to you, but it will be for the general public and likely to some in Congress.
Retired rear admiral, Tim Gallaudet, will be providing some amazing testimony. It could be the bomb we've all been waiting for. And we may find out more about Immaculate Constellation too.
Sadly I do not believe that the general public has considerable interest in the subject, but I hope to be incorrect in my opinion, no matter what the outcome of today's hearing.
The general public doesn't have interest in significant numbers yet, but the numbers are increasing. Of more significance is the fact that carefully crafted propaganda, using the ego sensitivities of the academic class, have been breached. Those walls haven't completely crumbled yet, but the process has begun, due to the efforts of highly credible witnesses being questioned in Congress.
Here is the new National Security Advisor, Michael Waltz, being interviewed by Ernie Sampera, of Florida's Voice News, a year ago. I mistakenly thought the interview was very recent.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SS5r4-Du-m4
I remember the contrail conspiracy. The idea that the government(?) was flying jets over certain areas of the US and spewing out some chemical to make people below cognitively stupid. Looks to me like they did not need to.
Prima facie.
Frightening, but explains why communicating with younger generations is so difficult.
Excellent Billy. Very alarming, at the same time. A plus on the side of rapid disclosure is the fact that MAGA is not as ideologically (or neurologically perhaps?) opposed to Disclosure and may be casting about for their next shot of adrenaline before Trump blows the Middle East to smithereens.
Two months is a long long time, in dog and social media years.
Right. And it's encouraging to see Republicans spearheading the push for disclosure. I'm not sure they appreciate the full range of destabilization it could wreak.
Michael Waltz, the new National Security Advisor, is also on board, in a big way. I will try to find and link to the video interview I watched yesterday where Waltz referred specifically to his concerns that the Pentagon was obstructing and threatening Grusch and others. Seems to be quite a significant leap frog over the current toads at the top.
Billy, what would constitute the bomb & who can drop it?
Since we don't know *exactly* what they're sitting on, I'd start with some basic housekeeping that wouldn't necessarily get anyone in trouble (at first). For instance, the "Estimate of the Situation" that came out of Project Sign in 1948 -- which concluded "flying saucers" had ET origins -- was allegedly destroyed, but I'd pull that one out of the vault. I'd declassify John Burroughs' (Rendlesham Forest) medical records, release them to him, and let him take it from there. Records from the 1981 Cash-Landrum Incident, which may or may not have involved a legit UFO, need to be declassified as a show of good faith. The 23-minute long triangle video that Elizondo has seen -- as well as the numerous others he's alluded to -- should be released,. The footage can obviously be scrubbed of metadata, and I'd put them out there in steady but unremitting batches between now and Jan. 20 that would lead to more obvious leads, i.e., the analyses of these images. Since they tell conflicting stories about their knowledge of UFO data, I'd put former CIA directors John Brennan and Robert Gates under oath. Put "Chase Brandon" or whatever his name is on the stand, too. I'm leaving out tons of stuff but it's a target-rich environment. And this is just for starters. As for who should release it, I'm not for Julian Assange-type data dumps, but agency leaders will likely need prodding from insiders with access to this material. Everyone needs to recognize the urgency of the crisis we're in.
Could you find ways to streamline to enable your audience to help make the demands & the complaints?
Not sure what that means.
I would like to applaud and support this article, but my constant computer use has significantly lowered my IQ to the point that I've already forgotten what the article was about.
Hey, thanks, hang on, um, I can't find my --
Terrifyingly well written, Billy. My god, what are we becoming.
Empty vessels waiting for masters to tell us what to do. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XJORWOJboU
One of your best, sir. Hat tip!
Larry, the people in the US that I'm in touch have an attendant concern, and that is Palestinian genocide.
They refused to reward Harris/Biden with a vote, preferring to vote Jill Stein, more as a pro-Palestinian protest vote. Now, those who stayed home, may have done so for purely economic reasons, but could have had strong moral reasons for doing so as well.
The university educated working class, those who haven't yet niched into the technocratic liberal sphere, (and likely never will) are solidly anti-establishment and anti-war.
This NYT guest essay by John Della Volpe does more to explain here:
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/11/opinion/kamala-harris-young-voters.html?searchResultPosition=1
Larry ,
This particular blog has lost its focus
It is or was intended to cover current events relating to the subject of UAPs or UFO's
It seems to have lost its way with the off topic discussions over the election outcome
Disclosure is a real knee slapper, according to you?
Trying to delete my response, but was unable to, so am editing it out here.
'Disclosure' has a clear meaning. As in, force those who have been operating in the shadows to come clean about crash retrievals.
That could easily segue from the nuts and bolts to the ethereal; an unknowable mystery.
I suppose the question in the minds of many who are familiar with the topic is whether it has a core physicality with technology that appears to give it a magical quality--or the reverse--that it has a core of pure consciousness, with attendant magical dreamlike elements, plus an ability to manifest as physical, or in the physical.
We are in our infancy when it comes to this subject. And, though I've been studying it for over 50 years, that is still, relatively speaking, a very short time.
I recently purchased Diana Pasulka's original book entitled "American Cosmic"
There's something else going on here and there''s a part of reality that we don't and never will understand.
For those without a subscription. A few paragraphs, copy and pasted below:
"As a pollster who focuses on the hopes and worries of these Americans, losing to Donald Trump — not once but twice — represents a profound failure. Ms. Harris’s campaign needed to shift about one percentage point of voters across Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin to secure the presidency"
"While Ms. Harris fought valiantly for the 107 days of her campaign, the party’s systematic disconnection from its base’s most urgent moral and economic concerns cost them the election."
David Brooks, also NYT, pointed to the same thing. Our society has created a large group of citizens who feel unseen, unheard. Trump and his wealthy cohorts found ways to reach many of them. The central emotional value of feeling understood was far more powerful than the details of Trump's mendacity. Later, when they complain about the problems that will arise for many of them, Trump will turn on them.
Yes, their own 'elite' will support their base when their desires align, but abandon them, when they don't.
I'll have to read what Brooks had to say. I have a subscription as much to follow the comments as the actual articles, as they tell me more, through reaction to articles, than the articles themselves.
"By the pricking of my thumbs,
Something wicked this way comes."