Communicating isn't my personal strong point and it's taken me years to realise it's important to get people on the same page.
Years ago I passed some offhand lame UFO comment to a colleague in relation to a picture I'd taken (even though I lean towards the ETH) and received a bland response. Only recently did I learn that this colleague had an unusual UFO/UAP sighting years before.
The UFO topic is contains many controversial claims and accounts which make it a difficult subject to navigate. Humour is often deployed as a defence, especially when we don't know the other person's point of view; and we're seeing this in the behaviour of some journalists and politicians. But the core issue is the unresolved questions. UFO doesn't mean non-human tech, it means something yet to be identified. Not everyone is satisfied with the position that there are no unresolved, highly credible incidents with very significant implications.
And that's exactly why journalists need to be the adults in the romper room and frame their questions for just what they are -- policy issues. They advance neither themselves nor transparency's cause by introducing the topic with smiles and hackneyed setups, or accepting non-answers for substance. This lightning-round bullshit needs to end. Aspiring White House occupants *must* be held accountable for their willful ignorance.
Governments function like well oiled roads - everything goes smoothly as long as the road is dead straight.
I'm amazed that the topic is even being addressed (in the U.S.) which only seems to have happened through lots of planning and effort.
The possibility that non-human tech has been hidden away is probably the most alien concept politicians and journalists will ever have to get their heads around, just to function and ask logical questions, rather than snicker and stick their heads in the sand. On the other hand, the ICIG made it pretty easy by stating that Grusch's info was credible and urgent. All they have to do is their respective jobs by investigating.
Great article! This makes one think -- what has Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Mario Rubio, Mark Warner, and Kirsten Gillibrand seen that makes them willing to put their political necks on the UFO chopping block?
It's gotta be overwhelming. And something tells me if the Schumer amendment doesn't pass, we'll lose the best chance we ever had of reclaiming everything we've lost, most of which we know nothing about. The question becomes, are there enough lawmakers willing to keep subsidizing a criminal enterprise in order to advance their political ambitions? I'm almost afraid to get the answer.
The coverup has always been evidence enough that the secret is big and likely bad. Whatever it is must at all costs be hidden away. I'm not sure government malfeasance warrants the level of protection this has entailed. Filling in the resulting blank doesn't sound like a lot of fun.
Billy, I think if the amendment goes down in flames information will be leaked. How do you control all the public-minded staffers working for various senators from keeping their mouths shut. Unless, of course, what they know is so horrifying?
Great deep dive into the topic in the US. I just wrote a similar post on Japan’s UFOs https://hiddenjapan.substack.com/p/the-land-of-the-rising-ufo
Communicating isn't my personal strong point and it's taken me years to realise it's important to get people on the same page.
Years ago I passed some offhand lame UFO comment to a colleague in relation to a picture I'd taken (even though I lean towards the ETH) and received a bland response. Only recently did I learn that this colleague had an unusual UFO/UAP sighting years before.
The UFO topic is contains many controversial claims and accounts which make it a difficult subject to navigate. Humour is often deployed as a defence, especially when we don't know the other person's point of view; and we're seeing this in the behaviour of some journalists and politicians. But the core issue is the unresolved questions. UFO doesn't mean non-human tech, it means something yet to be identified. Not everyone is satisfied with the position that there are no unresolved, highly credible incidents with very significant implications.
And that's exactly why journalists need to be the adults in the romper room and frame their questions for just what they are -- policy issues. They advance neither themselves nor transparency's cause by introducing the topic with smiles and hackneyed setups, or accepting non-answers for substance. This lightning-round bullshit needs to end. Aspiring White House occupants *must* be held accountable for their willful ignorance.
Governments function like well oiled roads - everything goes smoothly as long as the road is dead straight.
I'm amazed that the topic is even being addressed (in the U.S.) which only seems to have happened through lots of planning and effort.
The possibility that non-human tech has been hidden away is probably the most alien concept politicians and journalists will ever have to get their heads around, just to function and ask logical questions, rather than snicker and stick their heads in the sand. On the other hand, the ICIG made it pretty easy by stating that Grusch's info was credible and urgent. All they have to do is their respective jobs by investigating.
Great article! This makes one think -- what has Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Mario Rubio, Mark Warner, and Kirsten Gillibrand seen that makes them willing to put their political necks on the UFO chopping block?
It's gotta be overwhelming. And something tells me if the Schumer amendment doesn't pass, we'll lose the best chance we ever had of reclaiming everything we've lost, most of which we know nothing about. The question becomes, are there enough lawmakers willing to keep subsidizing a criminal enterprise in order to advance their political ambitions? I'm almost afraid to get the answer.
The coverup has always been evidence enough that the secret is big and likely bad. Whatever it is must at all costs be hidden away. I'm not sure government malfeasance warrants the level of protection this has entailed. Filling in the resulting blank doesn't sound like a lot of fun.
Billy, I think if the amendment goes down in flames information will be leaked. How do you control all the public-minded staffers working for various senators from keeping their mouths shut. Unless, of course, what they know is so horrifying?
Hope you're right. Maybe it'll take someone with stage 4 cancer to pull the trigger.