Regarding Harald Malmgren, I spent about five months looking into into his background in detail. On May 20, 2025, I published an article titled "Harald Malmgren: real-world history vs. grandiose fantasy." It runs 20,000 words, not counting numerous embedded documents, most of which had never been published before. Six of the key documents were long applications for federal jobs and security clearances that Malmgren signed and certified under penalty of law from 1963-1971. (33 pages of these were from FBI files which I got declassified on an expedited basis.) I examined 10 specific Malmgren claims in light of the documents, supplemented by email exchanges with people qualified to address specific claims, including Mark Kennedy Shriver (son of Sargent Shriver), Kai Bird (biographer of McGeorge Bundy), and Dr. Sheldon Stern (former historian of the JFK Presidential Library and author of three authoritative books on the Cuban Missile Crisis). I believe I demonstrated that Malmgren had for a long time been engaged in fabricating implausible grandiose stories about himself, and that he brought that proclivity to the UFO topic in 2024-25.
This is exactly the perspective I have taken recently on the topic. I’m so fascinated with what we might know or have access to at this stage, but the lack of vindication just makes even the craziest of concepts in the UAP and higher intelligence issue seem so mundane. It’s like they really succeeded at making the coolest thing in the world feel so dumb. Which sucks.
As per I posted on the the Weaponized youtube ch. on Matthew Brown Pt.3:
"While Mathew Brown seems legit and his testimony and answers fit a dark cover up, something appears off with him. This is not to mean I believe he is a plant but that his demeanor is quite odd and solemn. Something akin to someone who has had some kind of spiritual or religious experience and has difficulty talking about it. I had this feeling about him almost from the start. However when he said at the very end that "God is real", with little other context, I thought something is not quite right here. Maybe others can chime in about this but that is how I felt about this interview."
I would agree for the most part that any of these Whistleblowers are really not going to change much of anything at the moment. All media eyes seem to be on 'what is Trump going to do next' etc etc etc. There is no oxygen left for much of anything more. For me this Trump shitshow is just a diversion from dealing with anything else. Similar to the UFO mystery there is the ongoing AI revolution which currently has little to no policy or guidance coming from our esteemed government. Their hands seem to be tied and perplexed about what to do if anything. The argument that any government control over this technology will stifle innovation and cause us to lose the 'AI arms race' is generally the excuse to do nothing. Although there are differences, kind of sounds similar to the UFO coverup.
Brown's manner of speaking sounded totally consistent with what I might expect from a professional analyst. He spoke concisely, directly, and avoided sensational speculation. Not enough info to address his veracity, but no obvious red flags for me.
"God is real"? No context at all? Would a pro analyst say that at the very end? We really know nothing about Mathew Brown other than what he chose carefully and yes 'concisely' to say. He also talked about the 'Matrix' and that our reality is defined by entities who are in real control of our world. He just had this air of oddness that raised my guard as to his mental state of mind. That being said, he maybe totally legit as far as his accounts on his investigations etc.
It's my understanding some people who get close to this information or other experiencers, have some pretty weird, paranormal experiences themselves. I have no idea if this is the case. I thought he was measured and very careful with his words. Perhaps it stems from his background or other information he knows but didn't share. There are likely multiple reasons why disclosure is slowly rolling out. Accepting the notion They exist is going to be difficult to many people. Perhaps that explains his statement? I didn't get the vibe he's ultra-religious.
Not much left to do now except wait and see if any of his peers decide to back him up. Also, I'm still not clear on what happened with the Michael Shellenberger/Nancy Mace angle. That whole chronology seemed deliberately obscure.
Re: Shellenberger. I only knew him from his UFO reporting and thought he was a fair broker. But he was interviewed during the Los Angeles fires in January and came off as a MAGA-spouting loonie. Lots to criticize about public officials here, but his attacks were a "whoa" moment. Now back to our regularly scheduled program.
UFO whistleblower Matthew Brown in "Immaculate Constellation - A Whistleblower Honors His Oath : WEAPONIZED : Episode #76 : PART 3": "That's like the water wasn't there!"
The only thing I really disagree with is your assessment of Trump's emotional age. He feels free to scream and yell in the totally uninhibited manner of a neglected newborn. His instinctive reaction to common sense directions is the two-year-old's machine-gun NONONONONO! His instinctive reaction to any shiny object is the booming MINE, GIMME, MINE OR ELSE. Also age 2-3. His most mature reactions (age 4 & ½) are when he keeps changing the rules of the game so no one can plan. By age 4, kids can create chaos for large family systems. Tariff on & off (it remains in quantum superposition in Trump's intracranial vacuum).
It seems to me that the deeper plate tectonic shifts have to do with the new muscle of Silicon Valley pushing on the gate of the Gatekeepers of the Legacy Program. This push may look like Disclosure for a moment as the gate gets forced open and some blowers start whistling, but when all is said and done and the silicon dust settles, things will be pretty much the same as before. The Who said it best: “Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.”
Thanks for speaking for me, Billy. I am really fed up, both with the nonsense that passes for bombshells in this sphere and the unrealistic expectations that this 'administration' is going to do anything positive with regard to this subject. All this credulous hype about them taking the 'disclosure' bull by the horns is a sad joke.
And i don't buy pretty much anything about Malmgren's stories. I've read Chris Sharp's article about the Bluegill Triple Prime test. I think he's mistaken about several matters concerning that but the most important is what was redacted in the the video clip: It's not a frigging UFO that was blasted out of the sky! It was the warhead re-entry vehicle, which was the object of the test in the first place. The reason that it was redacted by one agency and not the other is that someone was simply being extra-special cautious about sticking to regulations regarding film footage of one of the nation's most sensitive items: a nuclear warhead. It's really that simple.
Given Malmgren's apparent propensity for aggrandizing himself it seems clear that he stumbled upon Sharp's Blue Gill story and inserted himself into it. Which, unfortunately, fed upon itself. And 'round and 'round we go.
As for Mathew Brown, i think he's sincere. But i also have good reason to consider him rather credulous, to the unfortunate point of destroying his credibility generally. More on that some other time.
In December 2024, Christopher Sharp's blog did publish an article laying out the theory that the Bluegill Triple Prime nuclear test (Oct. 26, 1962) knocked down a nonhuman UFO, but Sharp didn't write that piece. It was written by Geoffrey Cruickshank, an Australian researcher, who first circulated the theory in 2022. You are correct that Harald Malmgren merely attached himself to the theory in 2024; its timing fit into a story Malmgren had been telling for years about how he stymied a plan by USAF General Curtis LeMay to punitively nuke Soviet sites even after Khrushchev backed down.
As I mentioned in an earlier reply in this thread, I did extensive research into Malmgren and have just published a long article that proves, I think, that he was a brazen serial prevaricator about his past associations, credentials, and activities. But that did not discredit the pre-existing Cruickshank theory, which was based mainly on Cruickshank's own interpretations of declassified movies and old ships logs. I spent several months looking into the event, and on May 21, 2025, published a detailed article concluding that there was no substantial evidence that anything anomalous occurred during the Bluegill Triple Prime test. Three subject matter experts whom I contacted-- one of whom ran the project that produced the declassified movies of the test-- rejected Cruickshank's interpretation of the films.
I concluded that the falling object seen in two movies was not the re-entry vehicle-- which was only about 10 feet, 8 inches long, and was likely mostly reduced to vapor or very small parts by the 200 kiloton detonation-- but the 65 x 8-foot Thor rocket booster. I found in old declassified reports explicit textual references to the booster being seen and photographed not a great distance from the fireball.
If my muddled mind recalls correctly, Puthoff on Rogan mentioned UFO 'donations' referring to alien craft dropped on the doorstep of the major powers; he also mentioned the security issue of unintentionally filling in the knowledge gaps of those other powers. So it seems quite likely that stovepiped scientists around the world have little idea of what all the others know and are also trying to pluck nuggets of truth from the internet. If you're confused too, just remember, we're not alone.
I gave this article a thumb's up, not because it's one of your better ones, but because I feel exactly as you do. This whole Trump MAGAnazi thing is draining, and we have to somehow outlive it. This UFO business might ultimately be more important, but it doesn't feel like that at the moment. I'm not a drinker but feel I could use one or three. We need to fortify somehow.
TDS
Regarding Harald Malmgren, I spent about five months looking into into his background in detail. On May 20, 2025, I published an article titled "Harald Malmgren: real-world history vs. grandiose fantasy." It runs 20,000 words, not counting numerous embedded documents, most of which had never been published before. Six of the key documents were long applications for federal jobs and security clearances that Malmgren signed and certified under penalty of law from 1963-1971. (33 pages of these were from FBI files which I got declassified on an expedited basis.) I examined 10 specific Malmgren claims in light of the documents, supplemented by email exchanges with people qualified to address specific claims, including Mark Kennedy Shriver (son of Sargent Shriver), Kai Bird (biographer of McGeorge Bundy), and Dr. Sheldon Stern (former historian of the JFK Presidential Library and author of three authoritative books on the Cuban Missile Crisis). I believe I demonstrated that Malmgren had for a long time been engaged in fabricating implausible grandiose stories about himself, and that he brought that proclivity to the UFO topic in 2024-25.
https://douglasjohnson.ghost.io/harald-malmgren-history-vs-fantasy/
This is exactly the perspective I have taken recently on the topic. I’m so fascinated with what we might know or have access to at this stage, but the lack of vindication just makes even the craziest of concepts in the UAP and higher intelligence issue seem so mundane. It’s like they really succeeded at making the coolest thing in the world feel so dumb. Which sucks.
As per I posted on the the Weaponized youtube ch. on Matthew Brown Pt.3:
"While Mathew Brown seems legit and his testimony and answers fit a dark cover up, something appears off with him. This is not to mean I believe he is a plant but that his demeanor is quite odd and solemn. Something akin to someone who has had some kind of spiritual or religious experience and has difficulty talking about it. I had this feeling about him almost from the start. However when he said at the very end that "God is real", with little other context, I thought something is not quite right here. Maybe others can chime in about this but that is how I felt about this interview."
I would agree for the most part that any of these Whistleblowers are really not going to change much of anything at the moment. All media eyes seem to be on 'what is Trump going to do next' etc etc etc. There is no oxygen left for much of anything more. For me this Trump shitshow is just a diversion from dealing with anything else. Similar to the UFO mystery there is the ongoing AI revolution which currently has little to no policy or guidance coming from our esteemed government. Their hands seem to be tied and perplexed about what to do if anything. The argument that any government control over this technology will stifle innovation and cause us to lose the 'AI arms race' is generally the excuse to do nothing. Although there are differences, kind of sounds similar to the UFO coverup.
Brown's manner of speaking sounded totally consistent with what I might expect from a professional analyst. He spoke concisely, directly, and avoided sensational speculation. Not enough info to address his veracity, but no obvious red flags for me.
"God is real"? No context at all? Would a pro analyst say that at the very end? We really know nothing about Mathew Brown other than what he chose carefully and yes 'concisely' to say. He also talked about the 'Matrix' and that our reality is defined by entities who are in real control of our world. He just had this air of oddness that raised my guard as to his mental state of mind. That being said, he maybe totally legit as far as his accounts on his investigations etc.
It's my understanding some people who get close to this information or other experiencers, have some pretty weird, paranormal experiences themselves. I have no idea if this is the case. I thought he was measured and very careful with his words. Perhaps it stems from his background or other information he knows but didn't share. There are likely multiple reasons why disclosure is slowly rolling out. Accepting the notion They exist is going to be difficult to many people. Perhaps that explains his statement? I didn't get the vibe he's ultra-religious.
Not much left to do now except wait and see if any of his peers decide to back him up. Also, I'm still not clear on what happened with the Michael Shellenberger/Nancy Mace angle. That whole chronology seemed deliberately obscure.
Re: Shellenberger. I only knew him from his UFO reporting and thought he was a fair broker. But he was interviewed during the Los Angeles fires in January and came off as a MAGA-spouting loonie. Lots to criticize about public officials here, but his attacks were a "whoa" moment. Now back to our regularly scheduled program.
UFO whistleblower Matthew Brown in "Immaculate Constellation - A Whistleblower Honors His Oath : WEAPONIZED : Episode #76 : PART 3": "That's like the water wasn't there!"
https://ufointel.substack.com/p/ufouso-video-footage-gulf-of-america
Alfred Roesberg
That is one entertaining piece of writing. Really compelling, packed with info, with a POV we can all relate to.
Per your last point, I'd like to think so. But living in Florida feels like 6 March 1836 inside the Alamo.
The only thing I really disagree with is your assessment of Trump's emotional age. He feels free to scream and yell in the totally uninhibited manner of a neglected newborn. His instinctive reaction to common sense directions is the two-year-old's machine-gun NONONONONO! His instinctive reaction to any shiny object is the booming MINE, GIMME, MINE OR ELSE. Also age 2-3. His most mature reactions (age 4 & ½) are when he keeps changing the rules of the game so no one can plan. By age 4, kids can create chaos for large family systems. Tariff on & off (it remains in quantum superposition in Trump's intracranial vacuum).
I stand corrected.
😄😄 Schrodinger's economy! Why not?
I like your reframing!
It seems to me that the deeper plate tectonic shifts have to do with the new muscle of Silicon Valley pushing on the gate of the Gatekeepers of the Legacy Program. This push may look like Disclosure for a moment as the gate gets forced open and some blowers start whistling, but when all is said and done and the silicon dust settles, things will be pretty much the same as before. The Who said it best: “Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.”
At least somebody new will profit -- we just won't know their names.
“What so profit a man that he should gain the whole world, but lose his own soul?” I seem to remember that from somewhere.
Thanks for speaking for me, Billy. I am really fed up, both with the nonsense that passes for bombshells in this sphere and the unrealistic expectations that this 'administration' is going to do anything positive with regard to this subject. All this credulous hype about them taking the 'disclosure' bull by the horns is a sad joke.
And i don't buy pretty much anything about Malmgren's stories. I've read Chris Sharp's article about the Bluegill Triple Prime test. I think he's mistaken about several matters concerning that but the most important is what was redacted in the the video clip: It's not a frigging UFO that was blasted out of the sky! It was the warhead re-entry vehicle, which was the object of the test in the first place. The reason that it was redacted by one agency and not the other is that someone was simply being extra-special cautious about sticking to regulations regarding film footage of one of the nation's most sensitive items: a nuclear warhead. It's really that simple.
Given Malmgren's apparent propensity for aggrandizing himself it seems clear that he stumbled upon Sharp's Blue Gill story and inserted himself into it. Which, unfortunately, fed upon itself. And 'round and 'round we go.
As for Mathew Brown, i think he's sincere. But i also have good reason to consider him rather credulous, to the unfortunate point of destroying his credibility generally. More on that some other time.
In December 2024, Christopher Sharp's blog did publish an article laying out the theory that the Bluegill Triple Prime nuclear test (Oct. 26, 1962) knocked down a nonhuman UFO, but Sharp didn't write that piece. It was written by Geoffrey Cruickshank, an Australian researcher, who first circulated the theory in 2022. You are correct that Harald Malmgren merely attached himself to the theory in 2024; its timing fit into a story Malmgren had been telling for years about how he stymied a plan by USAF General Curtis LeMay to punitively nuke Soviet sites even after Khrushchev backed down.
As I mentioned in an earlier reply in this thread, I did extensive research into Malmgren and have just published a long article that proves, I think, that he was a brazen serial prevaricator about his past associations, credentials, and activities. But that did not discredit the pre-existing Cruickshank theory, which was based mainly on Cruickshank's own interpretations of declassified movies and old ships logs. I spent several months looking into the event, and on May 21, 2025, published a detailed article concluding that there was no substantial evidence that anything anomalous occurred during the Bluegill Triple Prime test. Three subject matter experts whom I contacted-- one of whom ran the project that produced the declassified movies of the test-- rejected Cruickshank's interpretation of the films.
I concluded that the falling object seen in two movies was not the re-entry vehicle-- which was only about 10 feet, 8 inches long, and was likely mostly reduced to vapor or very small parts by the 200 kiloton detonation-- but the 65 x 8-foot Thor rocket booster. I found in old declassified reports explicit textual references to the booster being seen and photographed not a great distance from the fireball.
https://douglasjohnson.ghost.io/bluegill-triple-prime-nuclear-ufo/
Thanks for your reply, Douglas. I did see your comprehensive article afterwards and i am in complete agreement with your assessment.
I suspect we'll be hearing a lot more about Malmgren in the near future.
If my muddled mind recalls correctly, Puthoff on Rogan mentioned UFO 'donations' referring to alien craft dropped on the doorstep of the major powers; he also mentioned the security issue of unintentionally filling in the knowledge gaps of those other powers. So it seems quite likely that stovepiped scientists around the world have little idea of what all the others know and are also trying to pluck nuggets of truth from the internet. If you're confused too, just remember, we're not alone.
Sometimes I feel like a motherless child.
Wise man say: A single photon helps to illuminate the universe, but does it know that it's born in a star?
Welcome back, Billy. Wonderful to hear from you!
I gave this article a thumb's up, not because it's one of your better ones, but because I feel exactly as you do. This whole Trump MAGAnazi thing is draining, and we have to somehow outlive it. This UFO business might ultimately be more important, but it doesn't feel like that at the moment. I'm not a drinker but feel I could use one or three. We need to fortify somehow.
On the money as always, Mr. Cox. I don’t care either, at this point.