I don't read mainstream media reports much. Any of them calling the White House on their blatant BS about the drones and FAA, or is it just the minor media outlets? I suppose there's some odd chance this is all designed to keep everyone confused and off-balance, with the coverup taking advantage of the dunderhead(s) in the administration. Or is everyone fronting the denials just bad at their jobs?
Barber's only evidence the "egg" was NHI was because he was "told" by his superiors, yet there's a possibility this could have been a test of loyalty, or even a psyop to self-sabotage him should he ever go to the press. Which he did.
BTW I never heard him confirm the footage released by News Nation was the same object he allegedly retrieved.
PS: How did his company get the contract to investigate the NJ drones, per his claims?
Each statement he made seemed to beg 10 additional questions. What I wanna know about is this apparent exchange of gunfire between recovery units attempting to get their hands on the sensor data stashed in those Panasonic ToughBooks. Problem is, if Congress puts him under oath, he'll probably say it's classified and you'll need a security clearance and a SCIF in order to get the details. So the snake keeps swallowing its tail.
On the theme of emotion, it struck me that Jake Barber's emotional reaction to the 'egg' seemed the oddest aspect of his interview and perhaps the most important. Is there some form of radiation (or other phenomenon) that triggers strong emotional reactions at a distance? Is it being investigated/weaponised by us? Is it in use by the guys upstairs? How many of us have experienced a similarly strong emotional response?
Wandering into the philosophical; what meaning would exist in a universe that didn't contain entities that could appreciate it and experience it emotionally? I've mentioned before that we don't know how to make robots perceive colour - we can get them to list the wavelengths detected by their sensors, but they can't perceive a rainbow's colourful aesthetic quality. Are emotions similarly mysterious (or can they all be traced to physical effects within the brain e.g. perhaps an itchy amygdala makes you feel nostalgic)? Do emoticons express all of the emotions humans can experience? (Obviously not.) How many emotions can robots (or AIs) experience?
While emotions are a significant aspect of our perceptions, scientific progress is based on information. While I can appreciate the drama, we're desperately short on verified facts. Why can't Burchett chair a UAP meeting (I really do want to understand the mechanics of Congress)? He seems to be the political representative most invested in finding answers.
How much of the truly alien performances, that are seen and experienced around the world, are designed to provoke an emotional response?
Great questions, and Barber's statement about how none of his other mission colleagues experienced any emotion at all suggests either a) he was targeted, or b) Barber's emotional antenna is an outlier. One could make an argument that the "others" are the product of hive-mind evolution with the amorality of ants. But instances like these obviously add another layer of complexity, with inferences of multiple species. Either way, I found Barber's testimony convincing.
Assuming any of this stuff is "real" and "alien" technology is involved off which someone might potentially make a buck, then it's easier now (since Inauguration Day) to know what the powers that be will NOT do: Anything that might endanger those (potential) bucks. Nor will anything be done out of a sense of honor, decency, morality, or patriotism. There's damn sure no money in those.
Interesting analysis, supporting my suspicions that Shellenberger is a two-faced grifter in league with bad actors. He spent years as a total shill for the nuclear energy industry, and then he suddenly becomes an inside expert on UFOs? Shady.
The "ego thing" belongs to Mace. Anyone who kneels to Musk cannot be trusted. Musk's South African maternally trained mind-set is framing his future as the jack-booted Emperor of the World.
I saw an older interview with his father where he talked about the pro apartheid views of his in-laws. He grew to detest them. It did not include any actual direct statements about Musk’s mother so it’s probably more accurate to say his maternal lineage. The assumption is that he was exposed to & influenced by his maternal grandparents strong apartheid leanings.
I don't read mainstream media reports much. Any of them calling the White House on their blatant BS about the drones and FAA, or is it just the minor media outlets? I suppose there's some odd chance this is all designed to keep everyone confused and off-balance, with the coverup taking advantage of the dunderhead(s) in the administration. Or is everyone fronting the denials just bad at their jobs?
Barber's only evidence the "egg" was NHI was because he was "told" by his superiors, yet there's a possibility this could have been a test of loyalty, or even a psyop to self-sabotage him should he ever go to the press. Which he did.
BTW I never heard him confirm the footage released by News Nation was the same object he allegedly retrieved.
PS: How did his company get the contract to investigate the NJ drones, per his claims?
Each statement he made seemed to beg 10 additional questions. What I wanna know about is this apparent exchange of gunfire between recovery units attempting to get their hands on the sensor data stashed in those Panasonic ToughBooks. Problem is, if Congress puts him under oath, he'll probably say it's classified and you'll need a security clearance and a SCIF in order to get the details. So the snake keeps swallowing its tail.
On the theme of emotion, it struck me that Jake Barber's emotional reaction to the 'egg' seemed the oddest aspect of his interview and perhaps the most important. Is there some form of radiation (or other phenomenon) that triggers strong emotional reactions at a distance? Is it being investigated/weaponised by us? Is it in use by the guys upstairs? How many of us have experienced a similarly strong emotional response?
Wandering into the philosophical; what meaning would exist in a universe that didn't contain entities that could appreciate it and experience it emotionally? I've mentioned before that we don't know how to make robots perceive colour - we can get them to list the wavelengths detected by their sensors, but they can't perceive a rainbow's colourful aesthetic quality. Are emotions similarly mysterious (or can they all be traced to physical effects within the brain e.g. perhaps an itchy amygdala makes you feel nostalgic)? Do emoticons express all of the emotions humans can experience? (Obviously not.) How many emotions can robots (or AIs) experience?
While emotions are a significant aspect of our perceptions, scientific progress is based on information. While I can appreciate the drama, we're desperately short on verified facts. Why can't Burchett chair a UAP meeting (I really do want to understand the mechanics of Congress)? He seems to be the political representative most invested in finding answers.
How much of the truly alien performances, that are seen and experienced around the world, are designed to provoke an emotional response?
Great questions, and Barber's statement about how none of his other mission colleagues experienced any emotion at all suggests either a) he was targeted, or b) Barber's emotional antenna is an outlier. One could make an argument that the "others" are the product of hive-mind evolution with the amorality of ants. But instances like these obviously add another layer of complexity, with inferences of multiple species. Either way, I found Barber's testimony convincing.
Assuming any of this stuff is "real" and "alien" technology is involved off which someone might potentially make a buck, then it's easier now (since Inauguration Day) to know what the powers that be will NOT do: Anything that might endanger those (potential) bucks. Nor will anything be done out of a sense of honor, decency, morality, or patriotism. There's damn sure no money in those.
That's my reluctant read on it, too. I do hope I'm wrong.
Spot on! Great deconstruction
Interesting analysis, supporting my suspicions that Shellenberger is a two-faced grifter in league with bad actors. He spent years as a total shill for the nuclear energy industry, and then he suddenly becomes an inside expert on UFOs? Shady.
The "ego thing" belongs to Mace. Anyone who kneels to Musk cannot be trusted. Musk's South African maternally trained mind-set is framing his future as the jack-booted Emperor of the World.
Explain maternally trained mind-set.
I saw an older interview with his father where he talked about the pro apartheid views of his in-laws. He grew to detest them. It did not include any actual direct statements about Musk’s mother so it’s probably more accurate to say his maternal lineage. The assumption is that he was exposed to & influenced by his maternal grandparents strong apartheid leanings.
Meanwhile, while drama queens hyperventilate, UFOs flit about, and the coverup remains strong.