Meaning, my capacity for processing complex plots like SRM is finite. I can't even wrap my head around the UFO stuff. Fortunately, what I think about SRM, UAP, or anything else doesn't really matter.
Maybe we should also be asking why someone is recovering craft? Are they crashing due to pilot error? Are they being brought down by us or something else? If they are failing from the sky it at least shows They aren't so advanced that They don't make mistakes. I don't buy the argument that crashes are deliberate. The one piece of info that bothers me about this issue is the involvement of allegedly less than honest individuals making money off the Phenomena.
I'm referring to Billy's article. Sorry if I wasn't clear. Suppose the U.S. Government has turned over crash debris to private corporations. My question beyond that mystery is why are the vehicles crashing in the first place? If these entities are so advanced you'd think they'd know how to move about without crashing. I'm wondering what's bringing them down? Another entity already here? Maybe we're situated in No Man's Land in some galactic/inter-dimensional power struggle. Maybe (if the stories are to be believed) that's why some people get snatched and subjected to crazy bullshit because one side wants to know if we've been modified.
I strongly lean towards the conclusion that the meeting between Wilson and Davis did occur, but I homed in on Wilson's comment above about appropriations...
It seems even more likely that Reid appropriated $22m specifically obtained for Bigelow - primarily because of the research he'd been conducting, and his purchase of the Skinwalker ranch.
So if companies like Lockheed Martin have similar sugar daddies, then it's not altogether impossible that black budget funding could be steered towards those entities under any guise - real or unreal.
Lets say Lockheed did obtain alien tech, plus funding to reverse engineer it, under a SAP. It's possible that (some of) the 'gatekeepers' were informed that 'UFOs' was just the cover story they needed to maintain if they were ever asked about the program. They might even be under the impression that the funds were obtained fraudulently (and believe they are complicit in a crime).
It's also possible that a UFO SAP might actually be a fraudulent conduit to funnel money into other projects, or to be dispersed elsewhere.
The point is that any deficiency of transparency at the top (e.g. Gang of Eight, Joint Chiefs, POTUS) means that anything can be disguised as anything else using cut-outs. The President could be informed that a UFO SAP is actually a stealth program, and even show him the work being done; when in reality there's been an alien craft hidden at S4.
Getting to the truth might require too much of a leap - accepting the possibility of recovered alien tech AND accepting that your system is compromised and basically corrupt - that you can't trust the answers you're getting. In which case, where do you go?
I've been thinking it over (while reading In Plain Sight), and can only think that someone in the public eye, like Robert Hastings, could ask for individuals to contact them if they've ever been asked to participate in an alien tech reverse engineering SAP, or related alien organism SAP.
I can't imagine any sitting President following up on this, or even a previous President, but like military witnesses to UFOs, we probably need a reliable and sympathetic point-of-contact for them to be able to come forward (and be vetted).
These guys (and gals?) might be able to blow the lid off, if they reached a critical mass, so to speak.
They'd have to ask themselves: Is keeping this information from the world the right thing to do? (Balanced against the potential benefit to the U.S. and the needs of the planet as a whole.) Are the secret keepers acting legally and ethically? Is there a reasonable limit to how long the secret should be kept, and what do we want for future generations?
I think the ever living fear of the consequences of violating a NDA keeps them from coming forward....On another note, I look forward to and have ordered the Coulthart txt book via Amazon ....due for release in a few months
I'm just recalling the British film about a real whistle-blower in GCHQ. The defence was that the defendant was releasing information in time to potentially save lives (ballpark wording, off the top of my head).
Given the state of the planet, it could be argued that we're desperately in need of an advancement in science to aid the development of nuclear fusion. The act of keeping alien tech secret means that fewer scientists have access; so any progress will be that much slower, as well as classified.
Fear is a powerful motivator, or 'demotivator' is probably a better word. I'm certain the secret-keepers are behaving in a patriotic manner, and there's nothing wrong with that; it's just that their envelope of concern is a little smaller than it could be.
Additional reasons for reverse-engineers to come forward:
1. The SAP exists because the core secret *is* the existence of alien tech on Earth - but that train has now left the station.
2. (Failed) Invitations to join an alien-tech reverse-engineering SAP, may have been a cover story for something else entirely; in which case the invited individuals don't really know what the truth actually is and would merely be admitting they were told something strange. If what they were told is true, then...
3. It's quite apparent that if such a SAP exists, then it wasn't made known to the executive branch (if only because they can't keep a secret); which means that the decision-making has been removed from the democratic process. (The secret-keepers consider themselves to be the best people to make those decisions for the Republic, even though they weren't Democratically elected - so what they are doing is unconstitutional.)
4. We in the West are fortunate enough as it is. Hoarding information about the Universe is just pure greed.
To be clear "we" have nothing to do with "the environmental horrors".
https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/a-climate-engineering-introduction-to-media-and-the-uninformed/
That spattering sound you hear = my brains dripping from the rafters into plastic buckets below.
Translation?
Meaning, my capacity for processing complex plots like SRM is finite. I can't even wrap my head around the UFO stuff. Fortunately, what I think about SRM, UAP, or anything else doesn't really matter.
SRM?
Solar radiation management.
Understood.
They've been doing far more than that for many years.
"I'll keep quiet... in order to keep my pension... and my boat house. Have a nice day."
Maybe we should also be asking why someone is recovering craft? Are they crashing due to pilot error? Are they being brought down by us or something else? If they are failing from the sky it at least shows They aren't so advanced that They don't make mistakes. I don't buy the argument that crashes are deliberate. The one piece of info that bothers me about this issue is the involvement of allegedly less than honest individuals making money off the Phenomena.
Are you referring to the movie or the UAP sigtings per se???
I'm referring to Billy's article. Sorry if I wasn't clear. Suppose the U.S. Government has turned over crash debris to private corporations. My question beyond that mystery is why are the vehicles crashing in the first place? If these entities are so advanced you'd think they'd know how to move about without crashing. I'm wondering what's bringing them down? Another entity already here? Maybe we're situated in No Man's Land in some galactic/inter-dimensional power struggle. Maybe (if the stories are to be believed) that's why some people get snatched and subjected to crazy bullshit because one side wants to know if we've been modified.
So good. Love ya BC.
I strongly lean towards the conclusion that the meeting between Wilson and Davis did occur, but I homed in on Wilson's comment above about appropriations...
It seems even more likely that Reid appropriated $22m specifically obtained for Bigelow - primarily because of the research he'd been conducting, and his purchase of the Skinwalker ranch.
So if companies like Lockheed Martin have similar sugar daddies, then it's not altogether impossible that black budget funding could be steered towards those entities under any guise - real or unreal.
Lets say Lockheed did obtain alien tech, plus funding to reverse engineer it, under a SAP. It's possible that (some of) the 'gatekeepers' were informed that 'UFOs' was just the cover story they needed to maintain if they were ever asked about the program. They might even be under the impression that the funds were obtained fraudulently (and believe they are complicit in a crime).
It's also possible that a UFO SAP might actually be a fraudulent conduit to funnel money into other projects, or to be dispersed elsewhere.
The point is that any deficiency of transparency at the top (e.g. Gang of Eight, Joint Chiefs, POTUS) means that anything can be disguised as anything else using cut-outs. The President could be informed that a UFO SAP is actually a stealth program, and even show him the work being done; when in reality there's been an alien craft hidden at S4.
Getting to the truth might require too much of a leap - accepting the possibility of recovered alien tech AND accepting that your system is compromised and basically corrupt - that you can't trust the answers you're getting. In which case, where do you go?
That's a pretty rosy scenario, Freeman. Maybe I'll just form a church and not pay taxes anymore.
I've been thinking it over (while reading In Plain Sight), and can only think that someone in the public eye, like Robert Hastings, could ask for individuals to contact them if they've ever been asked to participate in an alien tech reverse engineering SAP, or related alien organism SAP.
I can't imagine any sitting President following up on this, or even a previous President, but like military witnesses to UFOs, we probably need a reliable and sympathetic point-of-contact for them to be able to come forward (and be vetted).
These guys (and gals?) might be able to blow the lid off, if they reached a critical mass, so to speak.
They'd have to ask themselves: Is keeping this information from the world the right thing to do? (Balanced against the potential benefit to the U.S. and the needs of the planet as a whole.) Are the secret keepers acting legally and ethically? Is there a reasonable limit to how long the secret should be kept, and what do we want for future generations?
I think the ever living fear of the consequences of violating a NDA keeps them from coming forward....On another note, I look forward to and have ordered the Coulthart txt book via Amazon ....due for release in a few months
I'm just recalling the British film about a real whistle-blower in GCHQ. The defence was that the defendant was releasing information in time to potentially save lives (ballpark wording, off the top of my head).
Given the state of the planet, it could be argued that we're desperately in need of an advancement in science to aid the development of nuclear fusion. The act of keeping alien tech secret means that fewer scientists have access; so any progress will be that much slower, as well as classified.
If that's true its pretty effin pathetic thinking on the part of the..."keepers of the secrets"
Fear is a powerful motivator, or 'demotivator' is probably a better word. I'm certain the secret-keepers are behaving in a patriotic manner, and there's nothing wrong with that; it's just that their envelope of concern is a little smaller than it could be.
Additional reasons for reverse-engineers to come forward:
1. The SAP exists because the core secret *is* the existence of alien tech on Earth - but that train has now left the station.
2. (Failed) Invitations to join an alien-tech reverse-engineering SAP, may have been a cover story for something else entirely; in which case the invited individuals don't really know what the truth actually is and would merely be admitting they were told something strange. If what they were told is true, then...
3. It's quite apparent that if such a SAP exists, then it wasn't made known to the executive branch (if only because they can't keep a secret); which means that the decision-making has been removed from the democratic process. (The secret-keepers consider themselves to be the best people to make those decisions for the Republic, even though they weren't Democratically elected - so what they are doing is unconstitutional.)
4. We in the West are fortunate enough as it is. Hoarding information about the Universe is just pure greed.
Q: "Did you order a code red"
A: "You be I did" .....
Other than that I have no comment except to recognize honorable men
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aa80_sKNgM4
BOOM