Maybe sometimes it’s best if we don’t know what they’re working on … [sculpture by Mike Moffett] The prospects of a private corporation hijacking, monopolizing and concealing technology that could possibly mitigate the environmental horrors we’ve rained on ourselves doesn’t even sound like a half-decent eighth-season X-Files retread. Maybe the new normal is so shell-shocked, nobody even bothers to blink at loud noises anymore. Maybe taxpayers wouldn’t blink even if Congress announced an investigation into a corporate honeypot of exclusivity rights on space-alien hardware. What if the target of that investigation failed to produce so much as a widget or a receipt to account for what happened to all that loot after [pick a single-digit number] decades of raking it in?
Maybe we should also be asking why someone is recovering craft? Are they crashing due to pilot error? Are they being brought down by us or something else? If they are failing from the sky it at least shows They aren't so advanced that They don't make mistakes. I don't buy the argument that crashes are deliberate. The one piece of info that bothers me about this issue is the involvement of allegedly less than honest individuals making money off the Phenomena.
I strongly lean towards the conclusion that the meeting between Wilson and Davis did occur, but I homed in on Wilson's comment above about appropriations...
It seems even more likely that Reid appropriated $22m specifically obtained for Bigelow - primarily because of the research he'd been conducting, and his purchase of the Skinwalker ranch.
So if companies like Lockheed Martin have similar sugar daddies, then it's not altogether impossible that black budget funding could be steered towards those entities under any guise - real or unreal.
Lets say Lockheed did obtain alien tech, plus funding to reverse engineer it, under a SAP. It's possible that (some of) the 'gatekeepers' were informed that 'UFOs' was just the cover story they needed to maintain if they were ever asked about the program. They might even be under the impression that the funds were obtained fraudulently (and believe they are complicit in a crime).
It's also possible that a UFO SAP might actually be a fraudulent conduit to funnel money into other projects, or to be dispersed elsewhere.
The point is that any deficiency of transparency at the top (e.g. Gang of Eight, Joint Chiefs, POTUS) means that anything can be disguised as anything else using cut-outs. The President could be informed that a UFO SAP is actually a stealth program, and even show him the work being done; when in reality there's been an alien craft hidden at S4.
Getting to the truth might require too much of a leap - accepting the possibility of recovered alien tech AND accepting that your system is compromised and basically corrupt - that you can't trust the answers you're getting. In which case, where do you go?
To be clear "we" have nothing to do with "the environmental horrors".
https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/a-climate-engineering-introduction-to-media-and-the-uninformed/
"I'll keep quiet... in order to keep my pension... and my boat house. Have a nice day."
Maybe we should also be asking why someone is recovering craft? Are they crashing due to pilot error? Are they being brought down by us or something else? If they are failing from the sky it at least shows They aren't so advanced that They don't make mistakes. I don't buy the argument that crashes are deliberate. The one piece of info that bothers me about this issue is the involvement of allegedly less than honest individuals making money off the Phenomena.
So good. Love ya BC.
I strongly lean towards the conclusion that the meeting between Wilson and Davis did occur, but I homed in on Wilson's comment above about appropriations...
It seems even more likely that Reid appropriated $22m specifically obtained for Bigelow - primarily because of the research he'd been conducting, and his purchase of the Skinwalker ranch.
So if companies like Lockheed Martin have similar sugar daddies, then it's not altogether impossible that black budget funding could be steered towards those entities under any guise - real or unreal.
Lets say Lockheed did obtain alien tech, plus funding to reverse engineer it, under a SAP. It's possible that (some of) the 'gatekeepers' were informed that 'UFOs' was just the cover story they needed to maintain if they were ever asked about the program. They might even be under the impression that the funds were obtained fraudulently (and believe they are complicit in a crime).
It's also possible that a UFO SAP might actually be a fraudulent conduit to funnel money into other projects, or to be dispersed elsewhere.
The point is that any deficiency of transparency at the top (e.g. Gang of Eight, Joint Chiefs, POTUS) means that anything can be disguised as anything else using cut-outs. The President could be informed that a UFO SAP is actually a stealth program, and even show him the work being done; when in reality there's been an alien craft hidden at S4.
Getting to the truth might require too much of a leap - accepting the possibility of recovered alien tech AND accepting that your system is compromised and basically corrupt - that you can't trust the answers you're getting. In which case, where do you go?
Q: "Did you order a code red"
A: "You be I did" .....
Other than that I have no comment except to recognize honorable men
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aa80_sKNgM4
BOOM