Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Freeman69's avatar

It used to be that the only question was whether ET was actually visiting us or not, but these days you need a PHD in soap operas to keep track of who's on which side and what exactly might they know.

The short answer, as far as I'm concerned, is that the good guys are: Chris Mellon, Luis Elizondo and anyone else involved with TTSA, Eric Davis, Kit Green (and at least some aliens up there). Think that covers most of them.

(I still think that Elizondo's AATIP was a concocted story to grab a headline and AAWSAP was the only real element that ended in 2012 when the money ran out and all the deliverables were, er, delivered, to Lacatski, whose idea it was and who managed it and who was also the guy checking that BAASS got it right.)

I wonder what evidence Mellon and Elizondo were aiming to present to Mattis, but never got the chance; was it internal investigations of military UAP, or the output from AAWSAP? Perhaps Mr E will reveal that tidbit in his book.

I'm not sure I believe in the Collins Elite, and I'm not surprised that at least one misogynistic bully held high office in the DoD. Can't see Garry Reid opposing UAP research on theological grounds, but I can imagine someone with his rep being vindictive to anyone who upsets his personal applecart.

Perhaps Greer should be added to the list of good guys, or perhaps to a list of good guys gone gaga. Perhaps that's the fate of all of us who stay the course and stick to a particular theory, like a slightly off-course rocket that disappears over the horizon, landing who knows where, just very far away.

What can the military reveal? Even if true, could they officially confirm a UAP as having all the hallmarks of a technology not available to humanity as yet (based on the fusion of sensor data and eye witness accounts)? Would that be a finding that anyone would endorse for official release? Or would they equivocate and try to grab a piece, any way they could?

What's Mellon's end game? Does he hope that Congress will do right by the people (even with friendly individuals seemingly taking up the cause)? What would any government see as the serving the greatest good in such circumstances? (Hint: which general program receives more funding, FOIA or Intelligence gathering?)

Funnily enough, perhaps the only way we'll learn the truth is when fear is banished; is that what Greer has right?

Expand full comment
Bill Pilgrim's avatar

Back in May 2021 the DOD Inspector General's office issued a memo to just about every military and intelligence branch in the government announcing the start of an "evaluation to determine the extent to which the DOD has taken actions" regarding UAP.

I never saw anything about what prompted the decision to launch the evaluation, but I suspect the lack of cooperation with the UAP task force by various agencies and/or persons played a role.

Although Reid's dismissal is here attributed to ethical transgressions, I'm wondering if the IG "evaluation" is in the shadows here.

The IG memo also stated: "We may revise the objective as the evaluation proceeds..." A rather cryptic qualifier. Still, to me it suggests the focus of the evaluation might include identifying and 'retiring' long time hardliners who oppose and thwart more UAP transparency.

One can hope.

As to Dr. Greer, that's an interesting juxtaposition with your last piece about Kevin Day. Whereas Kevin's experiences sent him for a while into depression and personal drift, Dr. Greer went the opposite direction... to the Chrono-Synclastic Infundibulum.

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts