It's apparent that we're like a baby grasping for the moon. We don't have the intellectual, psychological or technological means to bridge the gap, as yet.
It's also slightly comforting to know that: Top Gun pilot or cave man, the universe can present you with an awe inspiring insight into the possibilities that lie ahead.
We can't expect ET to waddle up and heal a small cut. Hopefully humanity represents something worth saving, but individual humans will probably have to take their chances like everyone else who came before.
One day, in the distant future, we may be observing a developing world, wondering when to intervene. Who knows what we would have learnt by then.
Interesting that Langly sent up an F22 and shot down a Chinese spy balloon off the N. Carolina coast with an expensive AIM-9X sidewinder but seem willing to let 'drones'(?) fly and spy on their own facilities willy nilly. Their stated 'word salad' policy/excuse for doing so is there was no imminent threat to personnel or property on the facilities. Is there some distinction between a balloon spying or a fleet of drones? Apparently so, but again we are not to be privy to that distinction. Of course we do not want to shoot down some object and have it land on some kiddie on a playground but seems to me we have options that are not being even proposed. Like fly a damn heli up there to investigate?
We will likely never know the extent of the countermeasures deployed by LAFB against the "UAS" swarm last year. 17 straight days of overflights into an ostensibly secure no-fly zone and not a single defensive response? What they *really* don't wanna do is give us an itemized list of everything that failed. Our adversaries would love to hear about that.
"Maybe an airliner collision with a UAS at 17,500 feet would do the trick"(??)
We don't desire a catastrophe or is this the new way in thinking (??)
Never mind direct eyewitness testimony from those willing to face ending their careers or imprisonment.This will never happen.
The only way forward is via a dramatic disclosure which runs contrary to the SOL Foundation principles.This decision is in the hands (pun intended) of the NHI and and on their terms, since they've appear to be competent in remote viewing, including anticipating cap point locations with FA Squadron fleet.
As far as Davis-Wilson being subpoenaed?
Will never happen. They will summon legal counsel which is probably close by, at all times, to intervene by quashing subpoenas , thus wiggling out of appearances under public hearings involving sworn testimony.
I've been uncomfortable that Danny Sheehan has been doing what he usually does -- making himself very visible -- with respect to this subject. His recent remarks have done nothing to dispel that discomfort. I'm specifically annoyed with his bald assertions. I've never liked to see high-profile figures around this subject stating hard claims like he's doing. It's Steven Greer all over again. (I respect that Greer did accomplish a lot but fuck that guy all the same.)
I certainly understand what Wendt is getting at when he says that he doesn't "see the harm in trying to raise consciousness of the issue in whatever way we can" but I wonder whether he's really thought this through. Because "backfire" is something we ought always to keep in mind.
To the main subject: It's been frustrating that drones have come along to muddy the waters, so to speak, but not a little bit annoying that they nonetheless may be the cause for FAA to pay a bit more official attention to what's been going on.
When "whatever" includes literally whatever ill-conceived assertion from people who -- for whatever reason -- have a very high profile on this subject.
You've been on this beat for a long time, Billy. Surely, you've cringed more than a few times.
When I think about it, I'll bet I've vomited more than I've cringed. If somebody suggests we can fully comprehend the mystery by trepanning our skulls, get out of my way, I'm likely to vomit again. Um, even though I could be wrong.
Great article. They're pulling now this nuclear/tech/world and environmental destruction propaganda on young and unknowing (Rockefeller initiative psy-op) . Talking about morality...
Depends how you look at it. For me this narrative of parapsychology, consciousness, string theory, flying saucers and crafts (with rivets, gears etc.)- combination they were/are pushing is a cover up, agenda that just doesn't fit, because it's a made up scenario.
At least cases like Ruwa (Zimbabwe) and 'Belgian wave' or 'Gulf of fake Breeze' suggest that to me- which they put in their book as the best 'evidence'.
Not to mention all the other data pointing that and lack of definitive evidence (no proof, just myth building through time and our technological development)
Escapism to metaphysics, ethericism, spiritualism, ancient etc.
If it was/is intent to push the 'disclosure' through this kind of propaganda, then it's morally and ethically controversial, no matter the goal. (even if the goal is disclosure of possible something else)
There's a initiative to get people in conflicts together and not destroy each other and everybody else, through environmental message, 'NHI'/alien narrative etc.
And this also serves 'wests' globalization plans (neoconism, continuity of government etc.) and US in times when there's a possibility of conflict of huge proportions, effecting many, many lives and wide range of aspects of ' normal' life (globally) as we know it.
I guess Clinton didn't know what to do with it, because it was to risky and they didn't succeed.
FAA, take a look at these (2) UFO TV news reports.
“A MIG-21 Lancer struck four unidentified objects”
https://realtvufos.blogspot.com/2008/08/official-romanian-air-force-ufo-crash.html?m=1
Wish I were bilingual.
Billy, I bet Pentagon and/or CIA has/have investigated this case.
Me too.
It's apparent that we're like a baby grasping for the moon. We don't have the intellectual, psychological or technological means to bridge the gap, as yet.
It's also slightly comforting to know that: Top Gun pilot or cave man, the universe can present you with an awe inspiring insight into the possibilities that lie ahead.
We can't expect ET to waddle up and heal a small cut. Hopefully humanity represents something worth saving, but individual humans will probably have to take their chances like everyone else who came before.
One day, in the distant future, we may be observing a developing world, wondering when to intervene. Who knows what we would have learnt by then.
Interesting that Langly sent up an F22 and shot down a Chinese spy balloon off the N. Carolina coast with an expensive AIM-9X sidewinder but seem willing to let 'drones'(?) fly and spy on their own facilities willy nilly. Their stated 'word salad' policy/excuse for doing so is there was no imminent threat to personnel or property on the facilities. Is there some distinction between a balloon spying or a fleet of drones? Apparently so, but again we are not to be privy to that distinction. Of course we do not want to shoot down some object and have it land on some kiddie on a playground but seems to me we have options that are not being even proposed. Like fly a damn heli up there to investigate?
We will likely never know the extent of the countermeasures deployed by LAFB against the "UAS" swarm last year. 17 straight days of overflights into an ostensibly secure no-fly zone and not a single defensive response? What they *really* don't wanna do is give us an itemized list of everything that failed. Our adversaries would love to hear about that.
haha, i get it...
"Maybe an airliner collision with a UAS at 17,500 feet would do the trick"(??)
We don't desire a catastrophe or is this the new way in thinking (??)
Never mind direct eyewitness testimony from those willing to face ending their careers or imprisonment.This will never happen.
The only way forward is via a dramatic disclosure which runs contrary to the SOL Foundation principles.This decision is in the hands (pun intended) of the NHI and and on their terms, since they've appear to be competent in remote viewing, including anticipating cap point locations with FA Squadron fleet.
As far as Davis-Wilson being subpoenaed?
Will never happen. They will summon legal counsel which is probably close by, at all times, to intervene by quashing subpoenas , thus wiggling out of appearances under public hearings involving sworn testimony.
Per your question, I was being cynical, not sincere or even glib.
You do realize cynicism, sarcasm and irony have disappeared from the vernacular.
Wiseguys. Every time I turn around, wiseguys.
I've been uncomfortable that Danny Sheehan has been doing what he usually does -- making himself very visible -- with respect to this subject. His recent remarks have done nothing to dispel that discomfort. I'm specifically annoyed with his bald assertions. I've never liked to see high-profile figures around this subject stating hard claims like he's doing. It's Steven Greer all over again. (I respect that Greer did accomplish a lot but fuck that guy all the same.)
I certainly understand what Wendt is getting at when he says that he doesn't "see the harm in trying to raise consciousness of the issue in whatever way we can" but I wonder whether he's really thought this through. Because "backfire" is something we ought always to keep in mind.
To the main subject: It's been frustrating that drones have come along to muddy the waters, so to speak, but not a little bit annoying that they nonetheless may be the cause for FAA to pay a bit more official attention to what's been going on.
How might raising consciousness "in whatever way we can" backfire? Air it out.
When "whatever" includes literally whatever ill-conceived assertion from people who -- for whatever reason -- have a very high profile on this subject.
You've been on this beat for a long time, Billy. Surely, you've cringed more than a few times.
When I think about it, I'll bet I've vomited more than I've cringed. If somebody suggests we can fully comprehend the mystery by trepanning our skulls, get out of my way, I'm likely to vomit again. Um, even though I could be wrong.
Great article. They're pulling now this nuclear/tech/world and environmental destruction propaganda on young and unknowing (Rockefeller initiative psy-op) . Talking about morality...
What made the Rockefeller initiative a psy-op? Was its mission successful?
Depends how you look at it. For me this narrative of parapsychology, consciousness, string theory, flying saucers and crafts (with rivets, gears etc.)- combination they were/are pushing is a cover up, agenda that just doesn't fit, because it's a made up scenario.
At least cases like Ruwa (Zimbabwe) and 'Belgian wave' or 'Gulf of fake Breeze' suggest that to me- which they put in their book as the best 'evidence'.
Not to mention all the other data pointing that and lack of definitive evidence (no proof, just myth building through time and our technological development)
Escapism to metaphysics, ethericism, spiritualism, ancient etc.
If it was/is intent to push the 'disclosure' through this kind of propaganda, then it's morally and ethically controversial, no matter the goal. (even if the goal is disclosure of possible something else)
There's a initiative to get people in conflicts together and not destroy each other and everybody else, through environmental message, 'NHI'/alien narrative etc.
And this also serves 'wests' globalization plans (neoconism, continuity of government etc.) and US in times when there's a possibility of conflict of huge proportions, effecting many, many lives and wide range of aspects of ' normal' life (globally) as we know it.
I guess Clinton didn't know what to do with it, because it was to risky and they didn't succeed.
I lack your self-confidence, Primoz. Savor the gift.
Very successful.
"Garrison declared the nonhuman intelligence behind the UFOs has been asserting itself since the eruption of the nuclear age."
Various nonhuman intelligences have been asserting themselves in different ways into the affairs of Earthlings for thousands of years.
But they definitely ramped it up after Hiroshima and Nagasaki.