I’m still troubled by all the paranormal/ high strangeness factors surrounding UAP. I’m convinced they’re not of our reality. Why they’re here may be beyond our understanding. Why they’re interested in nukes most likely causes the military to suspect they’re planning an attack.
Apr 17, 2023·edited Apr 17, 2023Liked by Billy Cox
“Is there a new generation of strategic weapons?” Hancock wonders.
Any laser weapon should attract attention from aliens as no tech. in the universe can outrun a light beam. Ground-based or ship-based facilities maybe are being watched by the US for sightings.
Actually, just had a thought that just before the STS-48 shuttle UAPs (Sept. 15 1991) moved off at high speed in the video there was a flash then just after some sort of projectile (not a laser) seemed to go through the point where the so-called "main object" was - I recall the analysis by physicist Prof. Jack Kasher on this who showed the objects had to be in space and moving fast. Was this an alien/alien attack or human/alien? If ours what weapons do we have 30 years later?
Thanks for article Billy, fascinating that it seems there are trends in the observations they have of the facilities.
STS-48 is an interesting case, and I thought Jack Kasher's analysis (true unknown) was spot on. And if I was on the NASA team trying to decide whether or not to spend $ doing UFO research, resolving that mystery would be at the top of my list.
Billy, I left a comment to David Grinspoon (on the NASA team) on the Sky and Telescope site in February this year about STS-48 after his really good article. Well, as if they didn't know anyway.
I like this. Here's something similar from parts unknown: Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong. No matter how fast light travels it finds the darkness has always got there first and is waiting for it.
It's important to keep in mind that they had already seen 2 atomic bombs used in Japan in 1945 well before the interference incidents occurred during the Cold War.
So they may have found out something after Nagasaki and Hiroshima that we don't understand.
Have you ever read Trevor James Constable’s book They Live in the Sky? Basically the ones interested in nukes are cohabitants here that can’t defend against nukes. They are the ones that bring us the doom prophecies. They are essentially earth bound. So THEY are not ET, but UT. But actual ET’s exist and are monitoring. His theories line up pretty well with what Lue E. has hinted at extensively.
We don't know what the reason(s) may be behind apparent observations of nuclear facilities. I doubt that nukes cause problems beyond the Earth (as some claim). Perhaps it's an interest in the development and use of fissionable materials by primitive societies, or perhaps the nuclear age represents one of the most dangerous periods for any evolving civilisation (given how close we've come to WWIII).
Climate change appears to be a similar threat to human progress, but doesn't share the narrow focus points of secret bases.
If we do reach the point of acknowledging a non-human presence in the atmosphere and oceans, then when do we consider a presence on the ground?
Which, once again, raises the question of origins. I don't know why "they" would give a rat's ass about how we're destroying a remote ecosystem unless "they" are a part of it.
Intelligent beings might tend towards a more enlightened attitude when they are no longer simply striving to survive. 'Aliens Without Borders' type of thing, perhaps? Or maybe they are just interested.
What if diversity is considered precious to the extent that volunteers from primitive worlds are taken elsewhere as a hedge against their homeworld going pfffut, and some effort is made to increase the general chance of survival of the ones left behind? (You can't stop a species blind to its own destructive nature, but there are always other options.) - The ET gardener scenario.
All kids complain, at one time or another, that they have no say in the rules that grown ups make; that the world is not of their making. If we do expand into the Milky Way then we might discover that all the good real estate has been taken, and find a Galactic NATO concerned that we might be a nuisance to our neighbours... The Day The Earth Stood Still (remake).
Or there's the Bablylon 5 Minbari scenario where we find we're reincarnated into each others species - where they are part of our ecosystem... less probable, perhaps.
It may be that only 1 in a thousand alien civilisations include groups that are 'alienly' proactive, or interfere in any way.
As a total population, they very probably outnumber us by a lot, so, whatever we have down here, they have plenty more examples of, up there.
Does anyone know if the hearing will be on C-span or any other network?
https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/hearings/to-receive-testimony-on-the-mission-activities-oversight-and-budget-of-the-all-domain-anomaly-resolution-office
I’m still troubled by all the paranormal/ high strangeness factors surrounding UAP. I’m convinced they’re not of our reality. Why they’re here may be beyond our understanding. Why they’re interested in nukes most likely causes the military to suspect they’re planning an attack.
“Is there a new generation of strategic weapons?” Hancock wonders.
Any laser weapon should attract attention from aliens as no tech. in the universe can outrun a light beam. Ground-based or ship-based facilities maybe are being watched by the US for sightings.
Actually, just had a thought that just before the STS-48 shuttle UAPs (Sept. 15 1991) moved off at high speed in the video there was a flash then just after some sort of projectile (not a laser) seemed to go through the point where the so-called "main object" was - I recall the analysis by physicist Prof. Jack Kasher on this who showed the objects had to be in space and moving fast. Was this an alien/alien attack or human/alien? If ours what weapons do we have 30 years later?
Thanks for article Billy, fascinating that it seems there are trends in the observations they have of the facilities.
STS-48 is an interesting case, and I thought Jack Kasher's analysis (true unknown) was spot on. And if I was on the NASA team trying to decide whether or not to spend $ doing UFO research, resolving that mystery would be at the top of my list.
Billy, I left a comment to David Grinspoon (on the NASA team) on the Sky and Telescope site in February this year about STS-48 after his really good article. Well, as if they didn't know anyway.
https://skyandtelescope.org/astronomy-blogs/cosmic-relief-david-grinspoon/et-on-earth/
As I said to him, I bought the original VHS tape way back on Prof. Kasher's analysis! NICAP links to the analysis in the comment.
As far as we know, "no tech. in the universe can outrun a light beam".
"Light boasts of its speed, bragging there are none faster, but I am always there, waiting for it to arrive" -- Shiva
I like this. Here's something similar from parts unknown: Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong. No matter how fast light travels it finds the darkness has always got there first and is waiting for it.
Ha, probably a profound point too.
It's important to keep in mind that they had already seen 2 atomic bombs used in Japan in 1945 well before the interference incidents occurred during the Cold War.
So they may have found out something after Nagasaki and Hiroshima that we don't understand.
Have you ever read Trevor James Constable’s book They Live in the Sky? Basically the ones interested in nukes are cohabitants here that can’t defend against nukes. They are the ones that bring us the doom prophecies. They are essentially earth bound. So THEY are not ET, but UT. But actual ET’s exist and are monitoring. His theories line up pretty well with what Lue E. has hinted at extensively.
We don't know what the reason(s) may be behind apparent observations of nuclear facilities. I doubt that nukes cause problems beyond the Earth (as some claim). Perhaps it's an interest in the development and use of fissionable materials by primitive societies, or perhaps the nuclear age represents one of the most dangerous periods for any evolving civilisation (given how close we've come to WWIII).
Climate change appears to be a similar threat to human progress, but doesn't share the narrow focus points of secret bases.
If we do reach the point of acknowledging a non-human presence in the atmosphere and oceans, then when do we consider a presence on the ground?
Which, once again, raises the question of origins. I don't know why "they" would give a rat's ass about how we're destroying a remote ecosystem unless "they" are a part of it.
An interesting path to travel if one is not inclined toward the alien hypothesis.
Intelligent beings might tend towards a more enlightened attitude when they are no longer simply striving to survive. 'Aliens Without Borders' type of thing, perhaps? Or maybe they are just interested.
What if diversity is considered precious to the extent that volunteers from primitive worlds are taken elsewhere as a hedge against their homeworld going pfffut, and some effort is made to increase the general chance of survival of the ones left behind? (You can't stop a species blind to its own destructive nature, but there are always other options.) - The ET gardener scenario.
All kids complain, at one time or another, that they have no say in the rules that grown ups make; that the world is not of their making. If we do expand into the Milky Way then we might discover that all the good real estate has been taken, and find a Galactic NATO concerned that we might be a nuisance to our neighbours... The Day The Earth Stood Still (remake).
Or there's the Bablylon 5 Minbari scenario where we find we're reincarnated into each others species - where they are part of our ecosystem... less probable, perhaps.
It may be that only 1 in a thousand alien civilisations include groups that are 'alienly' proactive, or interfere in any way.
As a total population, they very probably outnumber us by a lot, so, whatever we have down here, they have plenty more examples of, up there.
Kabuki Theater: "ka, signifying “song”; bu, “dance”; and ki, “skill.”
Key word -- skill.
Which requires a lot of practice.